By Anna Von Reitz
Now, I Am Mad. Officially.
Finally,
apparently some time after it was issued. I finally got a copy of
Thomas of Manna Trust Fame's "Challenge". Why does it take days for this
stuff to come across my desk? It's the same with Karen Hudes. My email
address is all over the internet, posted on my website, etc., etc.,
etc., ----and yet, nobody bothers to send these dumb accusations
directly to me. It's all rumors until someone has presence of mind
(thank you, BTW) to copy and paste and actually bring the thing forward
so that I CAN respond to it.
So here it is with my answers in brackets:
1. Show us the letters received back from the important people you say you are working or dealing with.
[How
many thousands --nay, tens of thousands, of letters and phone calls and
emails over how many decades would you like to see? I started this in
1998. And most of the time, as you no doubt know. the rats don't reply
or don't reply directly, because the dead cannot speak to the living,
however, also according to their rules, a non-reply is actually a reply,
and proof of the mailing creates implied contract, so there you have
it. Dead in the water on their part and only God knows how many
communications on and off the public record there are bearing my name
and my husband's name. You bring your archives and I will bring mine and
I will bet hard money that what you've put your name to will look like a
very, very small pile compared to mine, which fills several rooms full
of filings and court cases and correspondences.]
2. Show people your internet income earnings, like we have done
[In
the first place, I have no "income". Income is corporate profit
accruals separated from capital, and I am not a corporation of any kind.
In the second place, the few thousand dollars that people donate to the
Living Law Firm every month is not "mine". Not only do I rarely take
anything from those funds, but I wind up supplementing anything I take
with later donations to the effort of my own, so far from having any
"internet income" from donations or from my books, the sum total for me
has been in the red, read that as "negative profit" for years and years
and years. So do you want to know how many thousands or dollars and
years of my UNPAID time has been dedicated to this? I have never totaled
up my losses. Too depressing to think about, so I don't. But if I have
Important People like you, who obviously haven't suffered the same as I
have, talking about "profit", then good for you that you still have some
profit to divulge. If pressed, I might make the effort to calculate my
losses, but I prefer not to be pitied for sacrifices that I willingly
made.]
3. Kim is a fraud but twice she asked to work with her, explain that.
[I
didn't say that Kim was a fraud---I confirmed that she was appointed
Trustee of Manna World Holdings to the best of my knowledge. And yes, I
also confirmed that she has had trouble with scam reports, which is
obvious and all over the internet. I think you have a somewhat biased
impression of actual roles here. Kim is supposed to release the trust
assets back to the people and the countries to which the assets actually
belong. I am one of those who have led the charge to force the exposure
and liquidation of The Trust, most particularly, by laying claim to all
the American assets that are owed to the actual American states and
people of this country and ending the phony "abeyance" of our
government. As such, she and I have to work together and it is begging
the question of who is "asking" to get this done and who is responsible
for doing it. I have asked her on two occasions to get off the fence and
do what she is supposed to do--- (1) Turn over the accounts that are
owed directly to the actual American states and people so that we can
restore the 3141 counties and 50 republican states to full function and
(2) Rescue the hijacked Guadalupe Hidalgo Trust assets which were
improperly traded instead of being disbursed to the actual Beneficiaries
who had already WAITED for OVER 200 YEARS to receive any benefit at
all. On both occasions, she "shined me on" and did nothing. So as far as
I am concerned, none of this gets settled until she settles with the
actual American Government and with the American Indian Nations. It
should be her concern to get in contact with me and with Michael Young
and do justice and work with us in that common cause.]
4.
Kim and codes are bogus she says, yet her partner in the now appears
rogue bank asked for the live codes from Kim, if both are bs why did
they ask? explain that
[I
didn't say the codes were "bogus"--- they are real enough, and they
part of an old, ugly, dishonest system of banking that needs to go away.
So I guess there is a distinction to be made between whether they work
in a practical sense, and whether or not they are honest and whether
this whole situation should exist at all--- which are two very different
topics. There are plenty of things that are actual and factual--- like
bank codes and accounts--- which have nonetheless been instruments of
fraud in the past and which because of that fraud, should actually be
null and void, even though we all have to continue working through that
matrix until a real settlement can be reached.]
5.
If she knew Kim and MWHT was a fraud as she NOW alleges, ignoring
points 3 & 4, why wait until now when things are done? explain that
[This
entire business, the very EXISTENCE of The Trust is based on fraud,
racketeering, identity theft, kidnapping, unlawful conversion,
enslavement, inland piracy---loathsome crimes against mankind. There's
no way to "dress that up" in a pretty dress and say that, oh, it's okay,
it's all valid, somehow---just because there is a big pot of assets
left over that the criminals have been astute enough to abandon. That
does not mean that the assets aren't real. It doesn't mean that Manna
Trust doesn't exist. The fraudulent nature of all that underlies it and
the need to focus on NOW and doing whatever justice can be done with the
assets, is the topic I addressed and which you either got the "wrong
impression" of or simply made wrong assumptions about.]
6. Anna wanted the inground resources via Hildago Treaty to her not the people, explain that.
[If
you knew or studied the history of this country and its treaties as I
have, you would know that the King of England retained the "in-ground"
mineral resources as part of the negotiated peace at the end of the
Revolutionary War and generation unto generation the pigs have taken
their "tribute" in the form of our mineral wealth. So when it came time
for severance for cause, the Queen attempted to sell off our minerals in
the ground to the Chinese--- a deal that I put my big, fat foot down on
and objected to. So, that was not just an objection affecting the
Guadalupe Hidalgo Trust, that was an objection affecting ALL the
in-ground mineral wealth controlled by The United States of America. I
suppose that I and my husband have become unavoidably associated with
The United States of America in the same way that any Head of State is,
and perhaps you heard someone gossiping about the in-ground mineral
claims in terms of "Anna wanted the in-ground mineral resources" of the
Hidalgo Trust because I objected to their sale and demanded their
ownership be returned to The United States of America as part of the
entire demand that ALL our in-ground mineral resources be returned to
our states and our people. Did you expect me to stand still and let
sharpies sell off our mineral wealth using the excuse that it belonged
to the Queen after we sacked her administration for cause and Breach of
Trust? Or sit here and let other entities claim one centimeter of our
soil? Please note--- the minerals are in soil. And whose soil is it? It
belongs to the American states and people, dba, The United States of
America (Unincorporated). So don't "personalize" it as if I were
objecting for my own little private self or as if I stood to gain
anything from objecting; quite the contrary, all I received for my
efforts were some nasty death threats from disappointed criminals and
bullshit assumptions from ignoramuses.]
7.
Anna says the money belongs to the people, and every show we have said
the money will go back to the people, is she hard of hearing?
[
I trust that if anyone has read my comments about "the money" they now
have a somewhat more enlightened view of what "money" is and is not.
Money, unlike commercial script, has to have asset value in-and-of
itself. So it is not just digits in a ledger it is gold, silver,
platinum, etc., etc., My rather jaundiced view is that whether we are
talking about "money" or talking about commercial script or digits, we
are still talking about "symbols of value" and the only difference is
actual money has commodity value and script and digits do not. Either
way, the thing people need to think about is what money is. Is it
possible to symbolize "value"? To put a price on a man's time on Earth?
On his life? On his culture? On his land? Really? I see the whole
concept of money as idolatry and delusion and false values and simply
changing from digits to paper to pieces of metal does not solve that
problem. Mankind as a whole needs new answers, not just a reboot and
redistribution of casino chips and false beliefs, but until we can all
emerge on a new plane of thinking about "value" we will have to slog
through a transition period and use these traditional baubles as a means
of trade. And yes, all the people on this planet deserve to have all
the baubles they need to thrive and survive until we all wake up from
the Mass Delusion of Money once and for all.]
8.
Anna never addressed any of the facts put forward last night in the
show, about her, her cousin, her connections or affiliations, please
explain that Ms. Ratzinger.
[Why,
exactly, should I address things that don't exist--? Once again, you
make all sorts of lame-brained assumptions. My family name is
"Reitzenstein" it comes from the Tyrol, a formerly German province now
part of northernmost Italy. Reitzenstein is a physical place and my name
"von Reitzenstein" means my ancestors represented that place in the
German government. The name "Riezinger" is a name my Great-Grandfather
made up as a pen name and adopted via court action in Bavaria in 1851.
It is, obviously, as a made-up name, unrelated to the common Westphalian
name "Reisinger" and it is also unrelated to the middle German lower
nobility family name of Pope Benedict--- "Ratzinger". Way, way, way, way
far back these names might have had a common root, and the
Reitzensteins of the Tyrol, the Reisingers of Westphalia, and the
Ratzingers of Ulm might have come from the same Celtic clan circa 1000
A.D., but I trust that even you will grant that is a sufficiently
removed association from the current families and people alive today and
that if I am in fact a "cousin" of the Pope, it isn't in the sense of
the word that people commonly think of. I might be such a "cousin" to
half the people in Norway, too. And since I am not Roman Catholic and
never was, I have nothing to say about any affiliation there, either.
Ignorant people don't know that there is a difference between the
"Universal Catholic Church" and the "Roman Catholic Church"--- but it is
surely time that they woke to hell up and learned. If it takes a
lightning bolt from heaven before they wake up and see even half of what
is right in front of their faces, I wouldn't be surprised at this
point.]
The
gist is Anna is coming across as one of the ego headed people who think
they are the one to save the world, and only them, it is all about the
glory of them and not we.
[If
you are not here to "save the world" and yet you are responsible for
making settlement, you'd better get on board and get with the
program---which is precisely my point above. Kim should be working with
the unincorporated national governments "of, for, and by" the people,
not toadying up to Presidents of governmental services corporations that
are bankrupt and in Breach of Trust and commercial contract. Trump is
eligible and we bonded the actual public office for him, but he hasn't
accepted, so right now, he has no actual contract to represent the
states and people of this country. So what is Kim doing trying to give
our assets to the foreign governmental services providers that defrauded
us and acted in Breach of Trust that landed our country in this mess in
the first place? Duh?]
Neither
Kim or I are seeking to be the one or the savior as laid out in several
shows, that has become clear to all who have interacted with me and the
show.
Whilst others talked, Kim delivered, all of them with their
self appointed, self importance titles, be it a Judge, M1s, Chief Clan
and Klan leaders, Chinese elders, Dragons, Archangels, Jesus, Mary,
Zeus, Isis, Goddess this and Goddess that, what did they actually
achieve? Their success rate is on a par with the RV crew - zero.
[What,
exactly, has Kim "delivered": to anyone so far? Where is the money I
asked for to fund the 3141 local county jural assemblies that have to
organized to restore our lawful government? Where is the money to fund
the badly needed education program to teach people the actual history of
this world and this country? Where is the money for The Living Law
Firm, to bring an end to the Foreclosure Mills that are decimating the
lives of millions of American families under conditions of open fraud?
Where are the resources to launch an honest banking system? Kim has
known of our valid needs for over a year and has done NOTHING to fund
any of these urgent NEEDS and she has for goddam sure known how many
trillions of dollars the American states and people are OWED. She also
has eyes in her head and can presumably hit a few search engines and
figure out that I am not related to the Pope, not Catholic, and didn't
ask for this unpaid and thankless "job" any more than she did. Again--
uh-duh.....!]
Anna
as I have said has a lot to offer, but needs to drop the glory of Anna
and her self importance, drop the white only group SS, get off her high
horse, and come and actually be apart of the all, to fix things on this
planet.
[Since
my husband's family has been fighting this fight since 1868, and been
on the run since Theodore Roosevelt threatened to kill them all in 1906,
it strikes me that the Newcomers however talented they may be, need to
get off of their "high horse" and come talk to those who have fought and
bled and fled for their lives and picked shit with the chickens and
lived like outlaws in their own country and devoted their lives to
freeing it against all odds and reason, in the face of open death
threats for six generations-----and come to our table to discuss and be
part of the solution instead of assuming that money is all that matters
on Earth or in Heaven. If money had anything to do with our devotion to
this particular cause we would have given up a long, long time ago. So
don't think we are going to come begging for what is ours. You are going
to yield up what is owed to The United States of America, to the actual
states and people. Or there will be no settlement.]
This is what this group is all about, no one more important than the next, creating leaders to lead, not rule over others.
So, what is it to be Anna, the new way of us and we, or the failed model continuation of me and I?
["New
model" my ass! What is new about giving everyone casino chips made of
gold, so they can play in your stacked gambling house? All this "caring
and sharing"? It wouldn't be happening, except that some of us got our
tails in a twist and exposed this whole gigantic fraud and demanded the
liquidation of The Trust. And who do you think did that? Who do you
think brought the Bills of Lading to do that? It was me and my husband!
Wake to hell up! The records are clear and you have access to them. So
either you are liars and cheats and thieves in sheep's clothing, like
all the rest of the Pretenders so far, or you are being unaccountably
obtuse about the facts that led to The Trust being turned over to Kim
for liquidation in the first place.]
A
world of caring and sharing, with compassion for all, and a love for
all, a concept so simple and yet it bamboozles many, time for real
change is now, as the old model never worked and has clearly failed.
Be the change.
[We have already been "the change". You are a result of that change. ]
----------------------------
See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
